by KEVIN D. FREEMAN | Global Economic Warfare | OCTOBER 12, 2020
For anyone with “eyes to see” and “ears to hear,” the Deep State plans for after a Biden win are more than obvious. They have been telegraphed for weeks, including the Nancy Pelosi-led effort to create a 25th Amendment Commission. All of this is well planned and orchestrated. It is an extraordinary effort to literally supplant this once-free nation with something we won’t even recognize. We will walk through some of the telltale signals in this blog (and also in Part Two to come).
What may be less obvious, however, is that other scenarios have been game planned as well. From the people who brought you the Russian Collusion Hoax and the phony Impeachment scandal, there is a contingency plan for any and every outcome of the November election. In each case, the clear intention is to dramatically and permanently change America. The end result would be a Marxist, technocratic dictatorship appearing as an Orwellian nightmare. Some might argue, a “Brave New World” nightmare even beyond the imagination of Aldous Huxley. Essentially, the elitists will package it as democracy but it would surely emerge as tyranny.
That sounds hyperbolic, so let’s unpack it. First, the “Game Plan” is absolutely true, brought to you by the nefarious and ironically named “Transition Integrity Project.” It sounds so nice! But it is a clear and present danger to our Constitutional Republic. As we will see (with startling new findings), they have ZERO interest in transition integrity. Quite the opposite. This is wholly about seizing power.
Just what is the Transition Integrity Project (TIP)?
Here is their own description taken from direct excerpts of the TIP report:
In June 2020 the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) convened a bipartisan group of over 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders and other experts in a series of 2020 election crisis scenario planning exercises. The results of all four table-top exercises were alarming….
The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) was launched in late 2019 out of concern that the Trump Administration may seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process. TIP takes no position on how Americans should cast their votes, or on the likely winner of the upcoming election; either major party candidate could prevail at the polls in November without resorting to “dirty tricks.” However, the administration of President Donald Trump has steadily undermined core norms of democracy and the rule of law and embraced numerous corrupt and authoritarian practices. This presents a profound challenge for those – from either party – who are committed to ensuring free and fair elections, peaceful transitions of power, and stable administrative continuity in the United States.
In June 2020, TIP organized four scenario exercises to identify risks to the rule of law or to the integrity of the democratic process in the period between Election Day (November 3, 2020) and Inauguration Day (January 20, 2021), with an eye toward mitigation and/or prevention of worst-case outcomes.
At this point it seems possible that either candidate may achieve a decisive electoral victory, but the goal of TIP’s scenario exercises was to gain a better understanding of the tests our democratic institutions could face in the event that candidates defy the norms that have underpinned American political practice for decades. Specifically, TIP wanted to examine some of the unknowns: How far might candidates go in contesting negative electoral outcomes or disrupting the normal transition process? How well would American institutions hold up if one or both candidates refused to “play by the rules”?
The four scenarios were developed after a consultative process involving outreach to experts on elections and transitions, political violence and instability, governance, and scenario planning and game design. Each of the four scenarios developed was different….
Sixty-seven people participated as active “players” in one or more of the scenario exercises, while dozens more participated in the exercises as observers and offered feedback during debriefing sessions. Participants included members of both major political parties, former high-ranking government officials (including, for example, two former governors), senior political campaigners, nationally prominent journalists and communications professionals, social movement leaders, and experts on politics, national security, democratic reform, election law, and media….”
If you didn’t know better, they make it sound like a plan to defend, rather than subvert, the Constitution. But if you look closely, it quickly becomes apparent that the goal is radical anti-constitutional change regardless of the election outcome. And don’t take my word for it. Read the ENTIRE DOCUMENT carefully HERE. And just to verify, Here is MSN’s link to the TIP report. And here is ANOTHER LINK to the same report. And ANOTHER, just in case one or more “disappear.” And here is a rational commentary: Democrats are Telling Us They Will Not Accept a Donald Trump Win. Are You Listening? And one from Fox News.
THIS REPORT IS SO UNBELIEVABLE, AND YET VERY FEW IN AMERICA KNOW THAT IT EXISTS. EVEN FEWER UNDERSTAND THAT EARTH-SHAKING IMPLICATIONS! THE TRUTH MUST GET OUT BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!
A few things to note about the TIP Report:
- It begins with a clear anti-Trump bias. It is in no way bi-partisan. While blaming Trump for all sorts of things, it completely ignores the full-on, well-documented, “Worse than Watergate” coup attempt perpetrated against him. Here is their explanation for the project: The Transition Integrity Project (TIP)1 was launched in late 2019 out of concern that the Trump Administration may seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process.” Those “assumptions” are as biased as you can get.
- The people involved are uniformly anti-Trumpers. Byron York lists a “few participants: John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Jennifer Granholm, Bill Kristol, Max Boot, other anti-Trumpers.” [And yes, it’s that “spirit cooking” John Podesta playing a lead role.] They call it “bi-partisan” but the so-called Republicans were avowed “Never Trump” Biden endorsers. This is the same tactic taken by the so-called “bi-partisan” Debate Commission. There’s not a Trump supporter among them. And yet, President Trump continues to have massive Republican support. According to a Gallup survey in mid-September, 94% of Republicans approve of President Trump’s job performance, the highest since January. And that is with clearly skewed polls! So it’s not like it would be hard to find a pro-Trump Republican to include.